Newfoundland: New items in the news
My head is spinning and my inbox is exploding with information that keeps pouring in--maps, iq charts, news articles, blogs (woo-hoo!)--which show the current political situation in historical perspective, in geographic perspective, in 3-D, in comic relief (and none of them are very flattering, I assure you). But I'd like to achieve something like a sense of synthesis, and maybe we can help one another on this. Here are some of the most provocative things I've seen recently:
ON VOTING FRAUD:
I am super-concerned by the reports on possible election fraud, for example, such as the one published on the Truthout website (thanks, Dad!) and also on the Common Dreams site (thanks, Ann!). Are these crazily sensational? I know anecdotally I've heard about voting problems in Florida and Ohio, but this blows anecdote away, I fear. I've just been exploring Truthout and Common Dreams, and both of them are very provocative, very interesting sites.
ON HOW WE LOOK FROM AFAR:
Not so hot, apparently. There's an incredible editorial in the Guardian by Robin Cook, the politician who resigned his position in the government in protest of Iraq, I believe. He is sympathetic but alarmed.
Although thanks to Ann again, there are still a few ways to laugh, it would seem. You should definitely check out sorryeverybody for a bittersweet chuckle and feelings of solidarity.
ON WHAT'S WRONG WITH OUR SYSTEM:
Have you seen this video clip of Jon Stewart on Crossfire? They hate him. It's a kind of amazing exchange on the powers and responsibilities of the media. I hope this link works, but you can find it by googling Jon Stewart and Crossfire and then looking for the ifilm link.
ON WHY WE DON'T HAVE TO MOVE TO CANADA IMMEDIATELY:
John Kerry wrote a letter to his supporters, a sign-off email of sorts, and this website quotes the letter and replies, quirkily and concernedly. Funny, poignant, and found by Stephanie:
Michael Moore gives us 17 reasons, supposedly, not to slit our wrists. I'm convinced by some of them. One wrist only?
But then there's the astute historical perspective of John Cavanaugh, director of the Institute for Policy Studies, which gives some hope, too. Are these kinds of analyses consolatory? I keep wondering whether this situation is really extraordinary, or whether we are simply experiencing it as such. I tend to conclude the former, but what do I know, really?
This is of course an incredibly limited choice; feel free to add things, or to make comments! I LEARNED HOW TO INSERT HYPERTEXT. Now I feel like everything will be okay for the next four years.

1 Comments:
I suppose it's important for us to also be moderate, as this article by Tom Zeller Jr. warns us bloggers. Yes, folks, we've been sort of chastized. Bad bloggers. I think it still suggests that there's evidence that all, in the voting process, was not as it should have been. But apparently the vast conspiracy theory may be, well, just that...
Here's a little excerpt, and then the link:
The e-mail messages and Web postings had all the twitchy
cloak-and-dagger thrust of a Hollywood blockbuster.
"Evidence mounts that the vote may have been hacked,"
trumpeted a headline on the Web site CommonDreams.org.
"Fraud took place in the 2004 election through electronic voting machines," declared BlackBoxVoting.org.
In the space of seven days, an online market of dark ideas surrounding last week's presidential election took root and multiplied.
But while the widely read universe of Web logs was often
blamed for the swift propagation of faulty analyses, the
blogosphere, as it has come to be known, spread the rumors so fast that experts were soon able to debunk them, rather than allowing them to linger and feed conspiracy theories. Within days of the first rumors of a stolen election, in fact, the most popular theories were being proved wrong - though many were still reluctant to let them go.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/12/politics/12theory.html?ex=1101285990&ei=1&en=f311e16cbb3ddd41
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home